From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Loading souce Elisp faster Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:39:04 +0800 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <20130226063904.8797a8951015b281429f05eb@gmail.com> References: <877glwtt5i.fsf@gnu.org> <20130225215038.ab62ebb7b21a755178fb2848@gmail.com> <8338wkjsq5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361831993 9814 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2013 22:39:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 23:40:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UA6iP-00059J-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47331 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA6i4-00065L-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA6i1-000658-Tn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA6i0-00058o-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:39:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f50.google.com ([209.85.160.50]:55542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA6hw-00057f-O4; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id up1so1946511pbc.37 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:39:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yEEi5fyoteR9Utvhc9kRxcWIzRwGGe1FM/W0Tbd+LlY=; b=06Hyxpu8/k9Z7VhxM/H/EUGqStP1ixchct5acKCji1wwbZeagk9zhdL8qK3CAE2k4p YFo35U0gX+PlM3TkvcAEHP38PYW0PgoUFiDmBwPlh0zAzAb7YHRhRVPPc9lnq3EBJ9Uz 7xcU8tapSBINjIWNfXm2rVLl5EgOKwP8cNErxv2DnIANrWUUPqdlcalrP19i4OnHgl4j dQluae1xHwEytkVMH1Y2IzTnOokhCcGSJm3nHZlMVfBuuQrwnCA5cRuvTx8jZLiC16x5 WHLNnMfO1ShjEvXeYgOUon/QfXdi9kUHg7MR/ECpSO1dJyCHQTd5H393jesjIYud4RyF z84Q== X-Received: by 10.68.47.225 with SMTP id g1mr20207735pbn.148.1361831979705; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:39:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Emacs ([61.149.230.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eh5sm14029821pbc.44.2013.02.25.14.39.37 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:39:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8338wkjsq5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157353 Archived-At: On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:52:50 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > utf-8-emacs and utf-8 are not the same encoding. The former is a > variant used by Emacs internally, it won't be 100% recognizable by any > program except Emacs. Why `utf-8-emacs'? Why not `utf-8-auto' or `utf-8'? -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao