From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harald Hanche-Olsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: please review bug #13141 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:26:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20130121.162653.2105027028246728109.hanche@math.ntnu.no> References: <50FCEBE3.6070806@acdlabs.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358782368 14919 80.91.229.3 (21 Jan 2013 15:32:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 16:33:05 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxJHS-0003ak-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:27:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52524 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxJH6-0004AY-Sc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxJH2-00049O-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxJGy-0004my-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from hylle01.itea.ntnu.no ([2001:700:300:3::100]:44602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxJGy-0004mc-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:26:56 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440221AE246 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:26:54 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hylle01.itea.ntnu.no Original-Received: from localhost (245.248.202.84.customer.cdi.no [84.202.248.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hanche) by hylle01.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC0BD1AE21F; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:26:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:700:300:3::100 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156542 Archived-At: [Drew Adams (2013-01-21 15:05:12 UTC)] > That doesn't mean that the emacs session where you submit the report > must be an emacs -Q session. And some bug reports do not require a > recipe from emacs -Q, though that's always a good idea. I don't know about others, but I can't possibly send email from an emacs -Q session without going through a lot of trouble. Which means recent input and messages are almost always irrelevant. It might make sense to only include this data provided (y-or-n-p "Did you encounter the bug just now in this emacs session?") - Harald