From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorgen Schaefer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU ELPA visibility Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:47:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20121026004727.43a013bb@forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de> References: <5089B9A8.9030801@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351205260 17396 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2012 22:47:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:47:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 00:47:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRWDJ-0007u5-6t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:47:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRWDA-0001f1-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRWD8-0001ew-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRWD6-00063M-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from istinn.electusmatari.com ([83.169.37.145]:52791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRWD6-00063D-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de (hmbg-5f77d2e0.pool.mediaWays.net [95.119.210.224]) by istinn.electusmatari.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CF01D10037E for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:47:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5089B9A8.9030801@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 83.169.37.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154518 Archived-At: On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:14:00 +0400 Dmitry Gutov wrote: > Jorgen Schaefer writes: > >> It really is the most useful repository, though. And the only one > >> still actively maintained, among alternative repos. > > > > Marmalade is still maintained (currently by nicferrier) and quite > > useful, too: > > > > http://marmalade-repo.org/ > > Do you just mean "moderated"? The last commit to the engine was > almost a year ago: http://code.google.com/p/marmalade/source/list Four months, actually: https://github.com/nicferrier/marmalade/ - and he just confirmed to me that he is actively maintaining it. :-) He has been working on a rewrite as far as I know, but not sure how far that is. But yeah, I'm not sure how much commits to the *engine* of an archive say about its usefulness. Marmalade has multiple package uploads daily, and a pretty long list of packages. Regards, -- Jorgen