From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomohiro Matsuyama Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Should lexical-let use let in the situation lexical-binding is t ? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:28:07 +0900 Message-ID: <20120918192807.6a426ea58372355516a2ea50@cx4a.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347964104 21283 80.91.229.3 (18 Sep 2012 10:28:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:28:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 12:28:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv2Z-0005qy-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:28:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52422 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv2V-0007dO-97 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv2N-0007VW-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv2L-0003li-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from www6399u.sakura.ne.jp ([59.106.183.193]:54144 helo=cx4a.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv2L-0003jC-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from thinkpad (EM117-55-65-139.emobile.ad.jp [117.55.65.139]) by cx4a.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E134086C91 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:28:07 +0900 (JST) X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 59.106.183.193 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153376 Archived-At: Hi, Someone wants cl's lexical-let expand to let in the situation lexical-binding is t. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12456479/lexical-scope-in-emacs-compatibility-with-older-emacsen I'm not sure that is valid, but if so, I think we should modify lexical-let to improve performance. Regards, Tomohiro