From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pierre Lorenzon Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11585: Acknowledgement (24.0.50; corrupted byte compiled files) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:05:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20120530.100537.488385604.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> References: <20120530.085706.183065156.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338366227 5709 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2012 08:23:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:23:47 +0000 (UTC) To: 11585@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 30 10:23:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeC1-0006mB-4l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:23:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeC0-00076z-RU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeBx-00076W-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeBr-00028F-I0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeBr-000283-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeDF-0000jt-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pierre Lorenzon Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11585 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11585-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11585.13383662852820 (code B ref 11585); Wed, 30 May 2012 08:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2012 08:24:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeCy-0000jQ-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130]:25001 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZeCw-0000jA-CN for 11585@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 04:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([86.195.134.210]) by mwinf5d16 with ME id G8P71j00P4YY4DA038P7Dz; Wed, 30 May 2012 10:23:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 24.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60503 Archived-At: Hi, Ok I made a few tests by making the file name always more shorter and miraculously saw more and more discarded characters appearing in the byte compiled file. In my opinion the `byte-compile-fix-header' function is responsible of this undesirable behavior of the byte compile engine. I'll try to analyse more precisely this function and eventually write a patch if I discover that it is bugged. Anyway all these narroing region killing and widening in this function look mysterious to me and probably to complicated to obtain the desired result but I have to look at it more precisely. Regards ! Pierre