From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:24:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20120301212404.GB19099@acm.acm> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330637176 13052 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2012 21:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10906@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 01 22:26:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVu-0005mo-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:26:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVt-0001kT-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVq-0001jS-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVo-000744-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51109) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVl-00072y-M5; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVh-00047i-J4; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10906 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10906-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10906.133063716015843 (code B ref 10906); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10906) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2012 21:26:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DVQ-000472-Hs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:25:59 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:38732 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S3DUz-00046Q-HP for 10906@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:25:33 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 39962 invoked by uid 3782); 1 Mar 2012 21:24:50 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD955650C.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.101.12]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:24:44 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 19650 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Mar 2012 21:24:04 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57427 Archived-At: Hello, Dani. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:02:44AM +0100, Dani Moncayo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:14, Juri Linkov wrote: > >[...] > > Regarding bug#10906, I think `c-mark-function' should be rewritten > > to follow the logic of `mark-defun'. Any chance of a quick summary of how c-mark-function differs from mark-defun? > Agreed, and BTW, if `c-mark-function' is going to be revised, please, > take also this problem into account: > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5525 Again, what is this bug? Could you not even quote the title line from it? > Thanks. > -- > Dani Moncayo -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).