From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9214: `fundamental-mode-hook' not run when setting up `fundamental-mode' under certain circumstances; Info documentation incorrect Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:45:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20120130044549.GA32445@headley> References: <87wrex4ejy.fsf@gmail.com> <87k44c3yg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87wr8bzic0.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtnqo9w.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqe2zcvg.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327898825 2533 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 04:47:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Chong Yidong , 9214@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 05:47:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8w-0001jc-BZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:47:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8v-0003Oi-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8s-0003OS-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8p-0003ZC-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8p-0003Z8-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj8w-0004x3-5y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9214 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9214-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9214.132789876818968 (code B ref 9214); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2012 04:46:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44431 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj84-0004vt-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:39267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrj82-0004vL-Fa for 9214@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: by eekc1 with SMTP id c1so2097713eek.3 for <9214@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:45:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1MfdaXzha71cE3lXmqAp3MJFtmAOZfssNIsdgZSyllA=; b=H0t20vVsOcCmuDi5Cp5iYKPBIQPGPF+grIWv4VlFObDBFk8DYQIUONOeXa0XCjupZs FWuIeflgwNIzdlxVlEQ8D7vCB9LJ4t2e6QDf1lZV8aZ0mmcSJRGw3pfKT5gX9RPMu9YI 2BP+TByj33VrdUVS5KQnz1tA4q7lGFqMvs6Kc= Original-Received: by 10.14.3.226 with SMTP id 74mr4937069eeh.32.1327898753158; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:45:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (176.119.broadband10.iol.cz. [90.177.119.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n56sm67683157eeh.6.2012.01.29.20.45.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:45:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56212 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:16:11PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Exactly. I need a way to run code for _any_ new buffer (I don't > > really need to run the code for temporary buffers which never get > > any user interaction, but I don't think there is a way to set those > > apart), no > > There is a way: whether they call a major-mode function or not. Ooh, I did not know that. Thanks. Is this documented somewhere? (I.e., a recommendation that a major mode function should be called in any buffer of potential interest to the user.) In that case, `after-change-major-mode-hook' should do, after all. > Of course, some packages may erroneously forget to call a major-mode > function for those buffers, but the problem is in those packages. Yes, I admit I have code around that does(n't do) that myself (e.g. simple dumping of some text into a buffer left in fundamental-mode), as I had no idea calling e.g. `fundamental-mode' in a buffer already in fundamental-mode was supposed to be of some value (until I bumped into this problem, that is). -- Štěpán