On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:29:11 +0600
Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:22:30 +0600
> Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Good day,
> > 
> > Before the patch, hints were passed as "image_path" and "image_data",
> > which is incorrect, as Desktop Notifications Specification v1.2 clearly
> > states:
> > 
> >   The icon is defined by the "app_icon" parameter. The image can be
> >   defined by the "image-path", the "image-data" hint or the deprecated
> >   "icon_data" hint.
> > 
> > Most common (by far) implementation of spec - libnotify - seem to pass
> > them as described in spec as well, so current behavior looks like a bug.
> > 
> 
> Actually looking at previous spec versions (which can be found on
> http://www.galago-project.org/specs/notification/), there seemed to be
> an "icon_data" hint in 0.9, but not "icon_path", so I can guess that's
> where these came from.
> 
> Mentioned specs seem to be fairly obsolete now, and even if they
> should be supported, there doesn't seem to be any excuse to pass
> "icon_path".
> 

Hmm... and looking further at 1.1, which is mentioned a bit below in
the code, and even set as "notifications-specification-version", I see
that current implementation is actually correct.

Terribly sorry for the confusion and the noise, should've checked the
specs more closely.

Desktop Notifications Specification 1.1:
 http://people.gnome.org/~mccann/docs/notification-spec/notification-spec-1.1.html

P.S. Link to galago-project.org at the top of the module seem to be
bogus though - specs there only cover versions up to 0.9, but I guess
it's not worth a separate fix.


> 
> > Patch to pass "image-path" and "image-data" hints - as per spec - is
> > attached below.
> > 
> > Desktop Notifications Specification:
> > 
> >   http://developer.gnome.org/notification-spec/#icons-and-images
> >   http://people.gnome.org/~mccann/docs/notification-spec/notification-spec-latest.html#icons-and-images
> > 
> ...
> 
> 


-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net