From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dima Kogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8150: 23.2; cperl-uncomment-region is NOT an inverse of cperl-comment-region Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:38:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20110302203816.7e8e2fa1@smart> References: <878vwxgb07.fsf@cds.caltech.edu> <0aipw177lj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299128828 24863 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 05:07:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 05:07:08 +0000 (UTC) To: 8150@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 06:07:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0ke-0000vF-SO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 06:07:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49961 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pv0ke-0001mg-A3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35381 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pv0kZ-0001mO-DD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:06:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0kT-0004k2-4Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0kS-0004jy-US for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0JZ-000505-Mm; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:39:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dima Kogan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 04:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8150.129912710719181 (code B ref 8150); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 04:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2011 04:38:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0J1-0004zK-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:38:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ibar.cds.caltech.edu ([131.215.42.49]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv0Iy-0004z7-VD for 8150@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from smart (cpe-76-175-234-46.socal.res.rr.com [76.175.234.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ibar.cds.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6984ABA8276 for <8150@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:38:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0aipw177lj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:39:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44545 Archived-At: I can and I do, but the current behavior seems wrong. If (comment-region beg end -1) is no longer supported, it should generate an error instead of succeeding badly. Should we simply call (uncomment-region beg end 1) in that case? I can make the patch, but would need to know what the current plan is.