From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesse Sheidlower Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7987: 23.2; Refill error in message-mode Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:06:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20110211110639.GT21808@panix.com> References: <8lr5bj60dx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20110208154418.GL22848@panix.com> <20110210210209.GO293@panix.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297424198 23888 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 11:36:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7987@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 12:36:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnrIg-0007L5-Cr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:36:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnrIf-0004SV-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47209 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnrIW-0004RH-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:36:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnrIV-0002bu-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnrIV-0002bq-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:36:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnqhO-0002xa-2G; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jesse Sheidlower Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7987 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7987-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7987.129742187111359 (code B ref 7987); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7987) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2011 10:57:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnqhD-0002x9-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:57:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1.panix.com ([166.84.1.72]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnqhC-0002wz-4V for 7987@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257D1F082; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:06:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 834) id 8E97A8FDDE; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:06:39 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:58:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44035 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:58:17PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Well, I don't truly know how common this use-case is (though it's common > > enough that the EmacsWiki entry for Mutt and Emacs provides a > > workaround), but maybe it would also be good to be able to have > > message-mode accept the fact that you're editing a message body only? I > > personally don't use message-mode for the actual sending of messages, > > and in general I'd think that there could be reasons for wanting the > > editing and formatting features of message-mode without the sending > > features. Being able to say explicitly that you're editing the body > > AFAIK, more than 90% of message-mode's code i devoted to editing of the > headers and to the sending part of the job. E.g. I'm not sure what > happens if you try to use MIME attachments in your use-case, but > I suspect it won't work right. In my use-case you wouldn't do this; as with the headers, you'd normally attach MIME attachments using Mutt itself, not Emacs. Jesse