Re: Strange behaviour of produced latex-pdf

[Martin Weigele <martin@weigele.de>]

OK the disappearing subtree seems to have been caused by my declaration of
a non-existant "a5" latex (style) package. Works now fine with "a4". Thanks for 
your help. Took me a while to find out where to look for the latex log file. :-)

Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:53:05 schrieb Martin Weigele:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, um 23:26:05 schrieb Eric S Fraga:
> > "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
> > > On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:30 AM, Martin Weigele wrote:
> > >> Dear all, have encountered the following strange behaviour in
> > >> producing latex-
> > >> pdf from a standard outline, C-c C-e d . One of many top nodes is
> > >> seemingly
> > >> arbitrarily not broken down into subnodes. It works fine, however,
> > >> when
> > >> producing html. Emacs 23.1.1; org-7.4 manually installed; ubuntu
> > >> 10.04 LTS.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > >> Like others, the unrefined chapter contains only (sub)headlines, no
> > >> text yet.
> > >> Any ideas?
> > > 
> > > Aloha Martin,
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what you mean by "not broken down."  Could you
> > > provide an example of the LaTeX output?
> > 
> > I also do not necessarily understand what is meant by that but I can say
> > that I recently had some problems with the latex exporter, especially
> > over the weekend, not exporting the full document the way I would have
> > expected: whole sub-trees did not get exported to the latex although
> > they did come out in an HTML export, for instance.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce this problem with a small
> > example and the document where it was exhibited is large and
> > definitely not distributable.
> > 
> > Fortunately, the problem seems to have disappeared and my latex export
> > works just fine now -- and the document has not changed (it's under
> > revision control).
> > 
> > So, I can suggest to Martin: upgrade to the latest git version of org
> > and see if that helps?
> > 
> > eric
> 
> Thanks Eric, it appears that the fact that a whole subtree indeed
> disappeared from the latex output had left me kind of "speechless" :-) .
> No the problem does not go away with latest git sources.
> Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode