From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karl Voit Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:05:59 +0200 Message-ID: <2011-06-28T18-04-12@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> References: <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org> <2011-06-28T15-28-18@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Reply-To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbara-0008BZ-UF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:10:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbarY-0004mW-Vk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:10:10 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbarY-0004lF-JK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:10:08 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbarW-0002gg-Pz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:10:06 +0200 Received: from mail.michael-prokop.at ([88.198.6.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:10:06 +0200 Received: from news1142 by mail.michael-prokop.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:10:06 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org After re-compiling my elc files, I have now the following behavior: * Karl Voit wrote: > > created timestamp with «C-c .» > <2011-06-28 Tue> > > modified with «C-c.» to wednesday: > <2011-06-29 Wed> > > manually added repeater: > <2011-06-29 Wed +1w> > > «C-c .» + click on Jul 5th: <2011-07-05 Tue +1w> ... which is the fix to the original bug. Thanks! :-) > created another one with warning period: > <2011-06-28 Tue -1d> > > «C-c .» + click on Jul 5th: > <2011-07-05 Tue> > > -> warning period is lost :-( The warning period still gets deleted though :-( -- Karl Voit