From: jari <jari.aalto@cante.net>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 7408@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:08:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101121090848.GB29648@picasso.cante.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv8w0n1b9b.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
On 2010-11-21 00:45, Stefan Monnier wrote:
| > $ emacs -Q
|
| > (progn
| > (autoload 'return "cl-macs" nil nil 'macro)
| > (dolist (elt '(1 2))
| > (return elt)))
|
| This causes cl-macs to be run at an unexpected time. I.e. it's ruled
| out for being a contrived example.
Is the above code not valid? Does it not do what it is supposed to do;
to define `return' when it will be used for the first time?
| E.g. I'd be *really* surprised if it were an example you bumped into
| before this discussion.
Surprise or not, it demonstrates the defiency of claimed:
- "dolist and dotimes are 100% compatible with CL's definition."
The question is not about "missing return", but differing dolist
implementation in subr.el
Jari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-21 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <r6eo4w45.fsf@blue.sea.net>
[not found] ` <1213200935.4147.62.camel@cyberelk.elk>
2010-10-16 13:42 ` bug#7227: re-search-forward goes infinite loop with dash inside [] Jari Aalto
2010-10-16 13:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-16 21:25 ` bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project? Jari Aalto
2010-11-16 21:59 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-16 22:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-17 4:47 ` jari
2010-11-17 8:25 ` Glenn Morris
2010-11-17 13:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-17 12:47 ` Štěpán Němec
2010-11-17 13:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-18 22:02 ` bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return Jari Aalto
2010-11-21 5:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-21 9:08 ` jari [this message]
2010-11-21 17:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-21 18:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-17 14:18 ` bug#7408: Linux patchutils: Development of the project? martin rudalics
2010-11-15 10:51 bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return Jari Aalto
2010-11-15 17:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-15 17:49 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-11-15 19:38 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <handler.7408.D7408.12898423464754.notifdone@debbugs.gnu.org>
2010-11-15 21:21 ` bug#7408: closed (Re: bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return) jari
2010-11-15 21:57 ` bug#7408: 23.2.1 dolist -- subr.el and cl-macs differ with nil-block return Glenn Morris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-16 9:16 bug#7227: re-search-forward goes infinite loop with dash inside [] Jari Aalto
2010-10-16 11:27 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-10-16 11:39 ` Andreas Röhler
2010-10-22 7:55 ` bug#7227: Close bts:gnu Jari Aalto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101121090848.GB29648@picasso.cante.net \
--to=jari.aalto@cante.net \
--cc=7408@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.