From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tak Ota Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: simple useful functions Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:20:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20101103.192005.341892019.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> References: <87zktrasec.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20101103.110157.309054292.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <87pqulj0tn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288837229 6742 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2010 02:20:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 03:20:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDpR6-0004nP-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 03:20:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40959 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDpR5-00082N-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37353 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDpQx-0007zQ-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDpQw-0006yl-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.14]:15721 helo=TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDpQw-0006ye-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail41-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.245) by TX2EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.9.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:09 +0000 Original-Received: from mail41-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail41-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF29BC00089; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:08 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -12 X-BigFish: VPS-12(zz1432N98dNzz1202hzz8275dhz2fh2a8h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null);UIP:(null);(null);(null) Original-Received: from mail41-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail41-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1288837208830970_18488; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from TX2EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.253]) by mail41-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA89F0004C; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from mail7.fw-bc.sony.com (160.33.98.74) by TX2EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (10.9.99.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.44; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:08 +0000 Original-Received: from mail1x.bc.in.sel.sony.com ([43.144.65.112]) by mail7.fw-bc.sony.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id oA42K7ll004678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:07 GMT Original-Received: from localhost (tak-vaio-z790-043191018003.am.sony.com [43.191.18.3]) by mail1x.bc.in.sel.sony.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oA42K6wH003873; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 02:20:07 GMT In-Reply-To: <87pqulj0tn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew-6.3.50 on Emacs-23.2.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7600 built on 2010-06-30) X-Reverse-DNS: mail7.fw-bc.sony.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP2+, XP SP1+ (seldom 98) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132343 Archived-At: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:10:28 -0700: "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: > > > Uh, what "replace" functionality does "collect-string" provide? > > > > I followed your logic as you insist associating this command to occur > > which is defined in replace.el. > > Ah. "Irreconcilable technical differences" raise their heads once in > again. In *my* (X)Emacs, occur is defined in occur.el, and that's the > way it should be. :-) Ah. That explains the mutual misunderstanding. I was wondering why. -Tak