From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:10:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20101016.081001.354842786.wl@gnu.org> References: <20101016.080817.485378771.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287209420 5633 80.91.229.12 (16 Oct 2010 06:10:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 06:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 16 08:10:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6zyB-000684-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:10:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54069 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P6zyA-0001su-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50460 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P6zy2-0001sb-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P6zy1-0005KS-Ij for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:51167 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P6zy1-0005Jx-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2010 06:10:02 -0000 Original-Received: from 77.116.35.88.wireless.dyn.drei.com (EHLO localhost) [77.116.35.88] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2010 08:10:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18WVjRMYTgWCk3Yg9iR01pCP0nQUeqj+6EiMbDI2A salHfK/hikgkYp In-Reply-To: <20101016.080817.485378771.wl@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 24.0.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131753 Archived-At: > Well, I'm only doing `bzr pull', and it seems indeed to be more > responsive than previously. However, the amount of data transferred > by bzr is still excessively large. For example, updating from > rev. 101894 (Oct. 10th) to today's rev. 101979 (with `bzr pull') > used more than 20MByte! I forgot to mention that I'm currently using bzr version 2.0.5 in case this makes a difference w.r.t. the amount of transferred data. Werner