Re: [PATCH] etags: Add a small list of interpretors for Python

[Iustin Pop <iustin@google.com>]

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:36:06PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Currently, etags has no interpretors defined for Python, which prevents
> it from recognising Python scripts that have no extension. This patch
> adds a small list of interpretors for this language, which while not
> perfect (e.g. it will fail on specific versions like python2.4), it is
> better than the current situation where all scripts without an extension
> will default to Fortran.
> 
> Note: I debated adding a more detailed list, but it would get outdated
> quickly, so I left just these three versions. A regular expression for
> the interpreter name would be much better here, would implementing that
> make sense?
> 
> [please keep me CC-ed, I'm not subscribed to the list]

Ping? Is this the wrong list?

thanks!
iustin