From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion for epa-mail-mode Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20100726.062715.451057314.wl@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280118478 30694 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2010 04:27:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ueno@unixuser.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 26 06:27:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdFIB-0006PW-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:27:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdFIB-0004iI-0C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35245 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdFHj-0004VS-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdFHh-0006fY-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:55153 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdFHh-0006ey-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2010 04:27:21 -0000 Original-Received: from 77.118.68.171.wireless.dyn.drei.com (EHLO localhost) [77.118.68.171] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 06:27:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/I6MxvXKHI2MCw6r2SuxK+hmzZnZkzLyqC4PgWDk 77M0MKMD8oZnPR In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.53 on Emacs 24.0.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127819 Archived-At: >> epa-mail.el defines these keys: >> >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-ed" 'epa-mail-decrypt) >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-ev" 'epa-mail-verify) >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-es" 'epa-mail-sign) >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-ee" 'epa-mail-encrypt) >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-ei" 'epa-mail-import-keys) >> (define-key keymap "\C-c\C-eo" 'epa-insert-keys) >> >> I suggest also defining C-c C-c C-d, etc, >> because a sequence of all control chars is easier to type. > > Since C-c C-c is currently bound to mail-send-and-exit, using C-c > C-c as prefix will be a significant change. Do you have any other > key sequences in mind? I suspect this is a typo on Richard's side. He probably meant `C-c C-e C-d', `C-c C-e C-v', etc. Werner