On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:35:35PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:27:47 +0200 > > From: Agustin Martin > > Cc: > > > > > > I think that this bug report can be closed or renamed to something like > > > > 'Improve `ispell-alternate-dictionary' docstring'. > > > > > > I think the default for ispell-alternate-dictionary should be changed on w32. > > > > Or, more globally, find a good and not confusing name for default personal > > plain wordlist that can be used in every system, be it w32 or not, so it is > > tried first in `ispell-alternate-dictionary', something like > > > > (expand-file-name "~/.personal.words") > > How will that help, exactly? /usr/dict/words exists on almost every > Posix system, which is why ispell.el has that as the default. But > there's no comparable functionality on Windows, so the only way of > getting this work on Windows is to find or download such a file from > somewhere, and manually install it in some arbitrary directory. How > is Emacs supposed to know whether such a file exists, and where? [Really attaching diff] My initial intention was to provide an out-of-the box default for personal wordlist, useful for both w32 and *X systems. However, as you point out in another message, since this is originally an Ispell feature, I think I should not add an Emacs specific difference. Customizing `ispell-alternate-dictionary' (or `ispell-complete-word-dict') seems the way to go. However, docstrings and error handling for this complete-word stuff needs to be improved, so it provides useful and accurate information. I am currently trying something like attached patch where `ispell-alternate-dictionary' is set to nil if no default is found and checked before use. I find error message too long, but better that before. As usually, suggestions are welcome. It also changes `file-exists-p' to `file-readable-p' in `ispell-alternate-dictionary' definition. I have also noticed that ispell.el uses `ispell-alternate-dictionary' and `ispell-complete-word-dict' in a way that seems to be interchangeable, but confusing. The former was probably used at some time as a real alternate dictionary for spellchecking, but current use seems to be for completion. Have to think a bit more about this. Cheers, -- Agustin