From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Agustin Martin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6411: Ispell string or comment Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:00:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20100622150048.GA13614@agmartin.aq.upm.es> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277222434 9675 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2010 16:00:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:00:34 +0000 (UTC) To: 6411@debbugs.gnu.org, Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 22 18:00:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR5th-0000CA-CQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:00:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR5tg-0004Au-6q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42180 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR5sJ-00040V-2h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR5sH-00013F-Vq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:58:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR5sH-000139-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:58:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR5pS-0000ft-Jn; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Agustin Martin Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6411 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6411-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6411.12772221492585 (code B ref 6411); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6411) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2010 15:55:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR5pD-0000fd-Im for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from edison.ccupm.upm.es ([138.100.4.49]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR4y6-0000JI-Hs for 6411@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from agmartin.aq.upm.es (Agmartin.aq.upm.es [138.100.41.131]) by edison.ccupm.upm.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5MF0mvU002659; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:00:48 +0200 Original-Received: by agmartin.aq.upm.es (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9612046201; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:00:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:55:46 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:56:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:00:12 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37950 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Lennart Borgman wrote: > Here is a suggestion for a function ispell-comment-or-string for spell > checking of current comment or string, see attachement. Seems OK to me, specially for people using keyboard more than mouse. -- Agustin