From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unit test framework Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:17 +0900 (JST) Organization: Red Hat Japan, Inc. Message-ID: <20100614.202417.1121047217029269040.yamato@redhat.com> References: <4C1323F5.80301@fastmail.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276514720 23718 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2010 11:25:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: me@nschum.de, web@shellarchive.co.uk, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rubikitch@ruby-lang.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, phil@hagelb.org To: ohler+emacs@fastmail.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 13:25:16 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO7mx-0004VP-2L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:25:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44120 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO7mi-0002tn-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50400 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO7mZ-0002t2-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO7lc-0006Aw-T5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:23:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO7lc-0006AG-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5EBNgal021704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (beach.nrt.redhat.com [10.64.200.71]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5EBNcEc019637; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:23:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C1323F5.80301@fastmail.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.21 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125901 Archived-At: Christian, > I don't know if the code qualifies as well-maintained; I haven't > touched it in a while, since no bugs have been reported, but I haven't > been very good at accepting patches to add features, either. (Sorry > Yamato-san, I'll look at your patch today.) On the other hand, the > other frameworks have been dormant for long periods as well. I've confirmed that my patch is include in you tree. Thanks. As I wrote repeatedly supporting batch mode is a big advantage of ert. Masatake YAMATO