From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Integrating package.el Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20100301223031.GE16169@headley> References: <8763795zsh.fsf@hagelb.org> <87r5pmwcf8.fsf@hagelb.org> <87ocjh2hyp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <873a0qxrd1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87635gqe8k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <201bac3a1003011337t54d88508ga10ec83b519eca1d@mail.gmail.com> <20100301221831.GD16169@headley> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267482625 12409 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 22:30:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:30:25 +0000 (UTC) To: Jonas Bernoulli , Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 23:30:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmE84-0001wk-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:30:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmE84-0000aC-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmE7v-0000Wb-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44857 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmE7t-0000Tr-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmE7s-0003ix-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]:60942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmE7s-0003ib-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3065250fxm.26 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:30:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=bh8aBzgweUCTkEizW24qGzrZ8EYqjSC4HVZkcC95FQQ=; b=dNzd3XUmwaC1tKy0g/SbGfJLP68qCC4fsJduRVc/pYmxAWOHlxMV9K4Xi1qbz56POD c/xeaWcYvwxnNNe07S8VwIdNX5/66XyZc5kIIB2Zj6IKC/ZO3F/PEvjCRNdY3ifklGL9 W1xmFBsTqzNhQlihzC+03RyDUI+78y6rdDChQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=lIdNalTwivUk9UIWpJT2R3yGVP1bADZ5lnsXXOCHxpiVLuePLr6r8W+Gc+z7okU/xu wPddVwnojruUtNvbze4vRlgGpr07Vi9KKAx/cr7hfw43vA2OrUY9rC7au7y7v3HGbB4S OQU6ZXmt1dww5PHwU/dO2IPMmZSfNRNWcLRYo= Original-Received: by 10.223.77.66 with SMTP id f2mr5666483fak.84.1267482606940; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:30:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([88.103.132.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm6192830fkx.10.2010.03.01.14.30.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:30:06 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: Jonas Bernoulli , Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100301221831.GD16169@headley> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-27) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121521 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:18:32PM +0100, Štěpán Němec wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:37:43PM +0100, Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > > Speaking of version strings, are there any conventions how an author > > should version his packages? Currently when I make edits after a > > release and make them public while not wanting to release yet another > > version I usually just add a "+" after the version. > > > > 0.1 -> 0.1+ -> .... -> 0.1+ -> 0.2 > > [just a thought:] > Maybe using something compatible with what `version-to-list' and friends > can understand? ... which is actually the case even with the above: (version-to-list "0.1+") => (0 1 -3) so it's treated like an alpha release by default.