From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unable to close a bug in the tracker. Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:20:13 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <201001141920.o0EJKDE0019280@fed.local> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <3k6375fb19.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87vdf4lu4k.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263496741 8045 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 19:19:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 20:18:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVVDZ-0008Dr-EF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:18:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57469 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVVDa-0003GK-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVVDO-0003Ca-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVVDJ-00032S-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42307 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVVDJ-000328-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:37 -0500 Original-Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:57073) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVVDH-0008Vl-6k; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:35 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B4FCD74B; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:subject:reply-to:references; s=smtpout; bh=9ckqTp3J0ETusMQHJBvWw0Tr+ZU=; b=dwfibq6f6cU/xcPYP8zoucEBtEG+xxBPFvQVEAimHHl6w4eVXLooKTdvCrqAPJWVWccndXXdF/zt1gt/aH55PQuGVS0tOs4WoHX8zp1oBUfzQzopgEkjuO+c90E7WG8LOPJCL19eWW0NTij5OIZP69Qg4WC8u5hspv84anMD0yo= X-Sasl-enc: 6ZenNme/7ZtCh3EHPrOK+jG1y55i6xNGRa+RO81+8Hgx 1263496714 Original-Received: from fed.local (cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net [82.244.211.40]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E8B44AF682; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:18:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from fed.local (fed.local [127.0.0.1]) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0EJKFA5019285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:20:15 +0100 Original-Received: (from xavier@localhost) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0EJKDE0019280; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:20:13 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: fed.local: xavier set sender to xma@gnu.org using -f In-reply-to: <87vdf4lu4k.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:59:39 -0500) User-Agent: Rmail/23.1.1 Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) Jabber-ID: xavier@maillard.im X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120028 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: >Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Its web interface obviously sucks and that's a problem. > >I see there is a long-term project to improve it: > >http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2007/DebbugsWebUI This could be a win. Do we have general agreement here that our bug tracker would be better if it *did* have a web UI that allowed commenting and state-changing? I.e., the lack of these features is not considered a feature, right? I do (even if I never use it. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org