From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: colours in client on xterm (if an X frame is open at same time) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:32:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <201001101832.o0AIWPHR000315@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> References: <19270.28051.401596.689093@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201001072358.o07NwL1e006325@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <19270.54295.87807.81836@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201001080713.o087DpNv021759@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <19271.23938.742044.640825@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201001081828.o08ISZgT016268@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <201001090418.o094Iw6d007997@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <838wc7af0e.fsf@gnu.org> <201001100849.o0A8nrDE009786@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <83ljg596rf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263148676 8997 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2010 18:37:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ulm@gentoo.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 19:37:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NU2fb-00010Z-53 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:37:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NU2fb-00062n-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:37:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NU2fW-00062h-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NU2fR-00060v-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57955 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NU2fR-00060o-8R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:37:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:16942) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NU2fP-0005g1-EB; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:37:35 -0500 Original-Received: from colin-baker-v0.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.153]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NU2cU-0000tY-5E; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:34:34 -0500 Original-Received: from godzilla.ics.uci.edu (godzilla.ics.uci.edu [128.195.10.101]) by colin-baker-v0.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0AIWQvV004427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:32:26 -0800 Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by godzilla.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id o0AIWPHR000315; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:32:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ljg596rf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:03:48 +0200") Original-Lines: 16 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please send mail to helpdesk@ics.uci.edu or more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: o0AIWQvV004427 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119790 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:49:53 -0800 (PST) > > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > Cc: ulm@gentoo.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > In the case where everything works correctly (before the patch), > > when stepping through frame-set-background-mode (called by > > tty-set-up-initial-frame-faces) the default face gets set up wrong. > > So debugging hurts in this case :-( > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand: does it mean that stepping through > frame-set-background-mode changes the result? that is, it works > differently under a debugger than it does normally? Exactly.