From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:22:56 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200912281322.nBSDMuiG012663@fed.local> References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <87637r610w.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262006551 23611 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2009 13:22:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 14:22:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPFYE-0002sr-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:22:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPFYF-00007j-1f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:22:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPFXd-0008N5-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPFXY-0008Ki-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54173 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPFXY-0008Kf-Jh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37021) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPFXY-0004gl-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F31726EA; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:subject:reply-to:references; s=smtpout; bh=x8bMX1PeRRb457v4mzTP8U60Ugo=; b=c4sOASkOBnxuRcm2N8F+V3V02RiMC3ywCAeCj27T8twKxhqKXnRp6PSu2reYTSgRaEO5LmIReQUfEHEJGBnQvr4wo9xD0u6Wg3kJ0iBHvJDAa1gZf0ZGc1hE/HZtvdRp+Aao5eVFTFyjlJOfKBMGf9b+MpWeDVX6ZpSLjjHKeyY= X-Sasl-enc: fzZd4l5zVeX3VsSnnfz4anWo81RjuEF3ZXOI+e6rJDXu 1262006499 Original-Received: from fed.local (cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net [82.244.211.40]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7765549B037; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:21:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from fed.local (fed.local [127.0.0.1]) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBSDMwum012665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:22:59 +0100 Original-Received: (from xavier@localhost) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBSDMuiG012663; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:22:56 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: fed.local: xavier set sender to xma@gnu.org using -f In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:09:03 +0100) User-Agent: Rmail/23.1.1 Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) Jabber-ID: xavier@maillard.im X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118867 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: > Now with bazaar, according to the wiki page, it seems that I > must commit all files at once with a single log, and thus > all changed files are given the same log. Is that true? Is > that the right thing? Each commit should contain a single, logically complete change, with the commit message describing it. That is independent of the underlying VCS. In the RDBMS world, it is mroe or less an ACID transaction. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org