From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5235: 23.1; Unibyte keyboard input problem Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:19:38 +0100 Message-ID: <200912262019.38898.scianagoryczy@wp.pl> Reply-To: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261856296 9327 80.91.229.12 (26 Dec 2009 19:38:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:38:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii , 5235@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 20:38:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NOcSO-0000sq-2P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:38:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOcSB-0008N3-CU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOcS7-0008My-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOcS2-0008MM-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58524 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOcS2-0008MJ-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52921) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NOcS1-0003xY-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOcBH-0005H6-Jq; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:20:03 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= , 5235@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Tomasz =?UTF-8?Q?Zbro=C5=BCek?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5235 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5235-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5235.126185519720262 (code B ref 5235); Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2009 19:19:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOcBB-0005Gk-Jw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOcB9-0005GT-Dp for 5235@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:19:56 -0500 Original-Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 27697 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2009 20:19:47 +0100 Original-Received: from host89251746.3s.pl (HELO [192.168.18.177]) (scianagoryczy@[89.25.174.6]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 26 Dec 2009 20:19:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Content-Disposition: inline X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 [UQMU] X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:20:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33778 Archived-At: >So does this mean using latin-2 solves your original problem as well? >That is, are you able to edit the source files without the annoying >questions from Emacs when you save the files? No, latin-2 does not solve my problem:) I do not want to read/write file in latin-2 but cp1250! But yes, when saving in latin-2 then there is no problem (I mean, no annoying question) which exists when saving with cp1250. I understand that's because "convertion tables" are different for these both codepages and e.g. \210 code is differently converted. Once again, I want to load my file with cp1250, edit it (writing polish chars and see them properly on screen) and save buffer with cp1250. (Of course all the strange chars which comes from cp852 should be unchanged.) When I load file with cp1250 and then save this buffer with latin-2 then all the polish chars that were originally in cp1250 will be now in latin-2 and this is not what I want.