From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:18:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20090824221808.GA4852@muc.de> References: <200908032029.n73KTi9h017528@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <200908240807.n7O87ubg024643@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251152135 8940 80.91.229.12 (24 Aug 2009 22:15:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 25 00:15:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mfhoz-0003Ee-Eb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:15:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55770 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfhoy-0000As-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfhot-00009X-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfhon-00007m-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58415 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfhon-00007d-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:13 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:4246 helo=mail.muc.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfhom-0005Xq-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 79772 invoked by uid 3782); 24 Aug 2009 22:15:08 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9E51E63.dip.t-dialin.net [217.229.30.99]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:15:06 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6156 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Aug 2009 22:18:08 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114567 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:39:47PM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article <200908240807.n7O87ubg024643@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>, Dan Nicolaescu writes: > It seems that c-indent-region has been changed a lot. I'm not sure, > but perhaps that is the reason [for a slowdown]. How do the other > people think? The change was a bug fix. It shouldn't have slowed down indentation, at least not by more than epsilon. > --- > Kenichi Handa > handa@m17n.org -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).