Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends

[Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>]

tomas@tuxteam.de writes:

  > I have to concur with Stephen here. *If* someone is using SCCS with an
  > odd file managed by RCS, it'd be better having the SCCS commit fail
  > loudly (and leading the user to investigate the cause) than the RCS
  > commit failing (nearly) silently, leading possibly to a botched backup
  > much further down the time line.

Can you please describe precisely the scenario that you have in mind?
Because the above is not a problem.
It is not possible to commit at the same time files that are managed by
different backends.
More, the relative order of RCS and SCCS stays the same, so the behavior
for RCS and SCCS stays the same.

  > Note that I'm no user of RCS, much less of SCCS, so take this with the
  > appropriate two fists of salt.