* bug#3299: marked as done (hat key is not working)
2009-05-15 20:15 ` bug#3299: hat key is not working Ilya Molchanov
@ 2009-05-17 19:30 ` Emacs bug Tracking System
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-05-17 19:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Stefan Monnier
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]
Your message dated Sun, 17 May 2009 15:23:56 -0400
with message-id <jwvzldb4jqg.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#3299: hat key is not working
has caused the Emacs bug report #3299,
regarding hat key is not working
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)
--
3299: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3299
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4067 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 217 bytes --]
Hello!
in my xemacs (version 21.4.21) the at key ^
appears to be not defined. What is to be down to get
it typed properly?
I work with the US keyboard under Linux Mandriva
2009 Spring.
Thank you
Ilya Molchanov
[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1245 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1949 bytes --]
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Ilya Molchanov <ilya@stat.unibe.ch>
Cc: 3299-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#3299: hat key is not working
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:23:56 -0400
Message-ID: <jwvzldb4jqg.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
> in my xemacs (version 21.4.21) the at key ^
> appears to be not defined. What is to be down to get
> it typed properly?
I'd suggest you upgrade to Emacs ;-)
Or else, report this bug to the relevant place (XEmacs is a different
program than Emacs).
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread