From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1988: Making the license statement visible in the Emacs Manual Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:05:54 -0600 Message-ID: <200902060005.n1605sj16251@f7.net> References: <0eca8b5d3b47058ca39da3a27bf4b0c3@netwood.net> Reply-To: Karl Berry , 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233929778 26851 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2009 14:16:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: jessw@netwood.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 06 15:17:32 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LVRWN-0000eD-BR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:17:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVRV4-0000i3-53 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVEVP-0000OB-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LVEVN-0000Nz-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:23:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50251 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LVEVN-0000Nw-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59309) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LVEVM-0007nN-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n160NWl8030369; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:23:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n160F33j028028; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:15:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1988 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,documentation X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1988-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1988.123387877326713 (code B ref 1988); Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1988) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 Feb 2009 00:06:13 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from f7.net (server1.f7.net [64.34.169.74]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n16065N9026707 for <1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:06:07 -0800 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id n1605sj16251; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:05:54 -0600 In-Reply-To: <0eca8b5d3b47058ca39da3a27bf4b0c3@netwood.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:23:38 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24984 Archived-At: Well, here is a simple patch for emacs.texi. I hope I did it right, please let me know if there's any better way I should do this. I'm not sure if anyone will see it after the lengthy menu in the Top node, but if you're happy with it (as the original bug reporter), it's fine with me. Can you go through and make the same change to all the other manuals and send me the diff? Thanks.