From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: configure.in support for FreeBSD ia64/sparc64/powerpc Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:20:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <200902051420.n15EKgg1004352@rodan.ics.uci.edu> References: <200611032145.kA3Ljj6x078515@kobe.laptop> <87irhv28mx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20061106141015.GB3755@kobe.laptop> <18763.42713.941380.795066@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <200812191716.mBJHG0oC016436@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <18763.58258.187720.412172@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87prjo7xla.fsf@kobe.laptop> <18808.21525.878956.953074@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87y6x23dgj.fsf@kobe.laptop> <878wp2ab5w.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <18826.35104.33516.369804@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87myd1http.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233844409 21324 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2009 14:33:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ulrich Mueller , Giorgos Keramidas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 15:34:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LV5JP-0000CM-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:34:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41538 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV5I3-000741-GY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV56E-000768-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV56B-00073Y-S8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45213 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV56B-000732-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:20:59 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv2.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.120]:52495) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LV569-0004Os-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:20:57 -0500 Original-Received: from rodan.ics.uci.edu (rodan.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.9]) by sallyv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n15EKg6o008570; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:20:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by rodan.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id n15EKgg1004352; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:20:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87myd1http.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (Chong Yidong's message of "Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:55:14 -0500") Original-Lines: 22 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: n15EKg6o008570 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@rodan.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108789 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: > Ulrich Mueller writes: > > > As I see, with a conditional for __sparc64__ only (which is the right > > thing in my opinion). > > > > However, one week later there is the following commit: > > > > > > So was there really a problem with this on non-BSD platforms? > > (I'm just curious.) > > Dan, did you see any problem with this patch on non-BSD platforms? Didn't we have a long discussion about this and the last version of the patch from Ulrich is cited here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108082 anything happened to change the results of that discussion, do we want to start it again?