From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1191: How to contribute back changes for Emacs on Solaris Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <200810240022.m9O0Mki1011139@mothra.ics.uci.edu> References: <48F80A14.7010502@emvision.com> <200810170622.m9H6Mipv013865@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <48F8BD05.5010102@emvision.com> <200810172352.m9HNqwSb016244@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <48FAA706.2050806@emvision.com> <200810202229.m9KMTIjS025889@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <49001D97.3000602@emvision.com> <200810231935.m9NJZjZZ010299@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <49010007.2000607@emvision.com> <200810232306.m9NN6ELs011000@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <490106F5.1090708@emvision.com> Reply-To: Dan Nicolaescu , 1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224809419 18840 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2008 00:50:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Ali Bahrami Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 24 02:51:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KtAtb-0003Eb-9t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:51:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59792 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtAsV-000692-Nr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtAsQ-00064e-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KtAsP-000645-Tb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60566 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtAsP-000642-Kr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42050) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KtAsP-00084l-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9O0o2l6010498; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:50:02 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9O0U3v4005804; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:30:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1191 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1191-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1191.12248077884462 (code B ref 1191); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1191) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 24 Oct 2008 00:23:08 +0000 Original-Received: from barrelv2.ics.uci.edu (barrelv2.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.114]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9O0N5Z5004453 for <1191@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:23:06 -0700 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by barrelv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m9O0MlgZ004961; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by mothra.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id m9O0Mki1011139; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:22:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <490106F5.1090708@emvision.com> (Ali Bahrami's message of "Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:21:25 -0600") Original-Lines: 39 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: m9O0MlgZ004961 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:50:06 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:21850 Archived-At: Ali Bahrami writes: > Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > Ali Bahrami writes: > ... > > > % ./config.guess > > > i386-pc-solaris2.11 > > > % CC='gcc -m64' ./config.guess > > > amd64-solaris2.11 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This does not look right, it needs to be a triplet, not a pair, so amd64-pc-solaris2.11 > > I found that interesting too, which is one reason I showed that output > to Ben in our other discussion. I trust that he'll flag it if its wrong. > However, emacs configure is happy with this, so perhaps it's really OK, IMHO amd64-solaris2 is not a good idea. config.guess is used by anything that uses autoconf, there are many many scripts that depend on having a triple. What you had to fix in configure.in is just one such example. > I'll fix whatever is needed there. > > Isn't the idea of having a "vendor" for instruction sets rather > dated? I surely don't care who made my CPU, only what ISA it > supports and what OS is running. Probably, but it's been around for a while, so it's ingrained in many places... > > BTW, context or unified diffs are preferred here. > > Understood, and I have been sending context diffs until this > last one. The bits that got missed made me think that perhaps > it was the wrong thing. Sorry, I'll go back to doing that. The patch did not apply cleanly, I got rejects so I had to hand edit the change. Hence the problem, but don't worry about it, it's all good as long as things move forward.