From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:09:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20081023090908.GB2666@muc.de> References: <20081022091136.GB924@muc.de> <20081022151444.GE924@muc.de> <48FF58FB.6000302@harpegolden.net> <20081022211202.GA1037@muc.de> <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224752391 6308 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2008 08:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 23 11:00:52 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ksw3m-00079v-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:00:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ksw2h-0005FJ-Fz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ksw2a-0005Dr-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ksw2Y-0005Cy-6Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:59:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34645 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ksw2X-0005Cv-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:1657 helo=mail.muc.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ksw2W-0002bX-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 51434 invoked by uid 3782); 23 Oct 2008 08:59:29 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9E53152.dip.t-dialin.net [217.229.49.82]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:59:28 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 2827 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Oct 2008 09:09:08 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49001F5A.7040402@harpegolden.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104898 Archived-At: Hi, David! On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:53:14AM +0100, David De La Harpe Golden wrote: > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > > >OK, 100 random files.el. How big were they? > > > Probably fairly small. I went back and did the 180 .c files from the > emacs source tree, totalling 9.2MB, and that took 6-7 secs (Which was a > bit slower than I expected!) OK. Was that Emacs 22 or 23? Presumably 23. Any chance you could time it using the other Emacs? -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).