From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail-mbox branch Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:23:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20080910122304.GA28668@tomas> References: <877i9s4pf5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hc8vf97n.fsf@xemacs.org> <878wu3fd4r.fsf@xemacs.org> <87fxoa112r.fsf@xemacs.org> <87ljy0z7q9.fsf@xemacs.org> <48C7B2C6.9030409@pajato.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221048823 24098 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2008 12:13:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Michael Reilly Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 10 14:14:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KdOak-0002hE-5l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:14:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdOZj-00073z-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:13:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdOZf-00072c-S8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdOZc-00071n-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60528 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdOZc-00071k-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:13:28 -0400 Original-Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104]:57140 helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdOZY-0005cr-P3; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:13:24 -0400 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C57EA9006B; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:23:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C7B2C6.9030409@pajato.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103762 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:43:02AM -0400, Paul Michael Reilly wrote: > Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> ... and as I pointed out to Stefan, for many users it would be >> very convenient and would cause no harm to transcode the headers too. > > I could not chase down that message and I'm a little confused about > transcoding headers to the extent that I understand them to be ASCII > per rfc2822. About the only way it would make sense to me to talk > about transcoding headers would be if headers are included (also > encoded) in the content encoding, i.e. a message that is text/html > could have html tags in the headers. Is this the case? Or are you say= ing=20 > something else? They may be quoted-printable. AFAIK this is the only allowed way of transcending US-ASCII in headers (but I don't know very "far"). Regards - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIx7woBcgs9XrR2kYRAvt5AJ9yL4DHsK3sqewuoVuvxAK+WUXqOgCdFEhp SmGl5U9jiHqnvJuvZQFMSXc=3D =3DDMEW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----