From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:13:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808231913.m7NJDQxZ002663@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uej4f3667.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:03:28 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:24:38 -0700
> >
> > Was the removed MULTI_KBOARD code actually needed?
>
> I don't know. I debugged the current code, and never looked back,
> because I knew it was pointless, and because in my experience
> comparing with older versions is not an efficient way of debugging a
> program. It's all in the logs and in CVS, if you really want to know.
So you are in effect saying that you preemptive attack was baseless and
without any technical justification (the HR approach was so wrong that's
not even worth disscussing). Refusing to provide a technical
justification after so many requests is quite telling. Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-23 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1KOODr-0006yO-BJ@monty-python.gnu.org>
2008-07-31 3:19 ` Removing MULTI_KBOARD Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-31 3:43 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-07-31 18:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-31 19:21 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-01 7:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 12:09 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-01 12:20 ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-08-02 5:12 ` Richard M Stallman
2008-08-02 6:55 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-02 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 9:27 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-02 9:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 10:10 ` Jason Rumney
2008-08-02 14:07 ` Chong Yidong
2008-08-02 17:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-02 22:49 ` Nick Roberts
2008-08-02 23:58 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-08-03 3:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-03 18:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-08-04 1:15 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-04 19:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-08-05 3:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-07 19:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-08-12 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-23 18:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-23 18:24 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-23 19:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-23 19:13 ` Dan Nicolaescu [this message]
2008-08-23 20:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-23 21:01 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-24 5:34 ` Richard M. Stallman
2008-08-24 9:36 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-24 10:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-08-24 18:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-26 21:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-08-23 20:18 ` Chong Yidong
2008-08-23 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-26 21:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-08-03 5:53 ` Miles Bader
2008-08-03 1:32 ` Richard M. Stallman
2008-08-03 1:33 ` Richard M. Stallman
2008-08-01 13:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-01 13:41 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2008-08-01 13:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808231913.m7NJDQxZ002663@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu \
--to=dann@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.