From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:41:20 -0700 Message-ID: <200808011341.m71DfK6u015253@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <200807310343.m6V3h1Zo006813@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200807311921.m6VJLxu1016770@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200808011209.m71C9Tj3018356@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217598357 14847 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 13:45:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 15:46:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOuxB-0002NT-Ep for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:45:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33571 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOuwG-0001j2-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:45:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOutr-0006zj-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOutq-0006y7-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36091 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOutq-0006xr-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]:44144) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOuth-0005wY-P9; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:42:22 -0400 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1218202882.36383@aWZEtB3r6WljbjWOIl8oZw Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m71DfK6u015253; Fri, 1 Aug 2008 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:30:41 +0300") Original-Lines: 20 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101882 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:09:29 -0700 > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > did we agree to remove MULTI_KBOARD or didn't we? > > > > Why? > > Because if it was discussed and I missed that, or by my silence let it > look like I don't object, I have only myself to blame and will need to > live with the results. If not, then there are other options. > > But basically, I don't understand why a simple question cannot be > answered without further ado. Is something wrong with how I asked it? Yes, big time.