From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lost antialias? Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:15:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20080621.101539.30495102.wl@gnu.org> References: <874p7n1jb9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214036171 11967 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2008 08:16:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, angelo.graziosi@alice.it, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: cloos@jhcloos.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 21 10:16:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9yHG-0006xL-5X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:16:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yGR-0005es-7m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yGM-0005ef-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yGL-0005eT-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:15:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56722 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yGL-0005eP-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:63232) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9yGF-0005t0-DU; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (p54AFBAF1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.186.241]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwtQ-1K9yFx0Dlp-0004MS; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:15:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2.53 on Emacs 23.0.50.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19fk2bk8nsJW+oc3pPDNOCdaF13LvHpHjEIhyF jxlURiWWYFtYQ/Z85I5UqUA+sIkskxDOqk1aNXteO8I1gL4fJy l/65LvmlkAMnppgplKUeA== X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99593 Archived-At: > IIRC, the issue was that the quality of the glyphs added by DejaVu > might not be the same as those in Vera, and perhaps other fonts > should take precedence for languages and scripts in that catagory. Indeed. The newly added glyphs lack proper TrueType bytecode hinting. If you use the autohinter of FreeType, there shouldn't be a visible difference. Werner