From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: which bug messages should be sent where? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:48:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20080611234800.GF17024@archimedes.ucr.edu> References: <86prqofey8.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <86skvjeqdf.fsf_-_@macs.hw.ac.uk> <485046CC.8090805@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213228114 19969 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2008 23:48:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:48:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 12 01:49:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6a3v-0004wy-36 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:49:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6a37-00088W-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6a34-00088Q-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6a31-00088E-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47176 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6a31-00088B-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:43762) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6a30-0001A3-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from archimedes.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m5BNm154032570 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:48:02 -0700 Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 16166 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:48:00 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <485046CC.8090805@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98987 Archived-At: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Jason Rumney wrote: > I agree, and the messages sent to bug-gnu-emacs should essentially > be the same messages as before (ie no control messages, and done > messages should be the raw message as the developer sent it, not > prepended with standard messages and the original bug report. I can swap these around for messages sent to the maintainer and mailing list so the -done is first, and the original message is at the end so the informative bit is the first thing that is seen. > The way I think the mail forwarding should work is this: > > > bug-gnu-emacs incoming mail address + numbered addresses for existing bugs > | > V > bug tracker > | > V > bug-gnu-emacs mailing list and newsgroup This is how it actually works. > emacs-pretest-bug incoming mail address + numbered addresses for > existing bugs > | > V > bug tracker > | > V > emacs-devel mailing list [I didn't set this up, so I'm not sure.] Don Armstrong -- No amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free [...] You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. -- Robert Heinlein _Revolt in 2010_ p54 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu