From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Don Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug tracker spam Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:51:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20080529235125.GF3071@rzlab.ucr.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212105106 9423 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2008 23:51:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 23:51:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 30 01:52:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K1ruy-0008PH-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 01:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1ruD-0004Vs-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1ru9-0004Vd-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1ru6-0004VR-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33259 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1ru6-0004VO-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56266) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1ru6-0003Qh-8W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 19:51:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m4TNpPjr022385 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 16:51:26 -0700 Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 8943 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 29 May 2008 23:51:25 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98023 Archived-At: On Thu, 29 May 2008, Glenn Morris wrote: > What's the recommended way to deal with spam in the bug tracker? > Just using "done" doesn't seem very good. If it's a new bug, I just kill them manually. If they're a message to an existing bug, I kill off the message. Don Armstrong -- When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked Him to forgive me. -- Emo Philips. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu