From: tomas@tuxteam.de
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org,
Patrick Drechsler <patrick@pdrechsler.de>,
tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:20:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080527082027.GB4034@tomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fxs8n29l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 06:23:18AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de writes:
>
> > As for whether Emacs or nxml has the burden of skipping the BOM -- that
> > would correspond to whether nxml "within" Emacs is "seeing" a piece of
> > XML or a whole XML document, right?
>
> No, I don't think so. First, as I tried to explain, I don't think
> that Emacs can reliably "know" that the BOM needs to be skipped at
> decoding time [...]
Yes, that makes sense to me now.
Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIO8RLBcgs9XrR2kYRAncjAJ938duk33W3ZcicieUZRjL/bL8qMwCdFD5S
bE1vV1K+rhD7nSNq/DeqDd8=
=cXki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-27 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <494CBBAC.2020706@f2s.com>
2008-05-17 12:31 ` 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-17 14:13 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-05-17 16:57 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-17 20:38 ` Mark A. Hershberger
2008-05-21 22:20 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-21 22:37 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-22 1:33 ` Mark A. Hershberger
2008-05-22 14:43 ` Tom Tromey
2008-05-22 21:24 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-22 4:17 ` tomas
2008-05-22 4:33 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-22 8:28 ` Jason Rumney
2008-05-27 8:22 ` tomas
2008-05-22 17:34 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-23 9:05 ` tomas
2008-05-23 21:23 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-27 8:20 ` tomas [this message]
2008-05-18 2:29 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-18 2:30 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-18 3:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-18 4:19 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-18 8:56 ` Jason Rumney
2008-05-18 11:00 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-19 3:11 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-19 14:32 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-19 18:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-20 15:16 ` Patrick Drechsler
2008-05-18 15:19 ` joakim
2008-05-18 4:13 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-18 5:40 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-18 9:14 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-19 3:05 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-18 23:40 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-19 20:34 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-19 20:57 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-19 23:36 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-20 7:13 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-30 2:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2008-05-30 3:44 ` Miles Bader
2008-05-30 3:59 ` Kenichi Handa
2008-05-19 6:32 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-12-20 9:40 ` bug#269: marked as done (23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8) Emacs bug Tracking System
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080527082027.GB4034@tomas \
--to=tomas@tuxteam.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org \
--cc=patrick@pdrechsler.de \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.