From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric M. Ludlam" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re[2]: What IDE features are in CEDET? Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:15 -0400 Message-ID: <200804252316.m3PNGFjG013853@projectile.siege-engine.com> References: <200804251727.m3PHRv2b012968@projectile.siege-engine.com> <48123A8F.6090504@gmail.com> <200804252145.m3PLjDMj013623@projectile.siege-engine.com> <4812567F.6030500@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209165392 9997 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2008 23:16:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 26 01:17:06 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JpXA9-0006hp-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:17:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JpX9T-0005im-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpX9P-0005ih-27 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JpX9N-0005iQ-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JpX9N-0005iN-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-184-83-10.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([71.184.83.10] helo=projectile.siege-engine.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpX9N-0000N5-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from projectile.siege-engine.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by projectile.siege-engine.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m3PNGFZi013857; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: (from zappo@localhost) by projectile.siege-engine.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id m3PNGFjG013853; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:16:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <4812567F.6030500@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95958 Archived-At: >>> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" seems to think that: >Eric M. Ludlam wrote: >> If you >> suspect the existing nxml parser output could be translated into the >> same style of output as Semantic's tag structures, that can work, but >> I'm not entirely sure what would be done with the results since xml >> is flexible enough to cause every schema to need it's own translator >> into Semantic tag format. > >I no nothing about the details. What I thought was that Semantic (or >perhaps more the user interface part of it) could ask nxml-mode for the >state, completione possibilities etc, whenever needed. Ah, that is certainly possible. I'd be happy to help someone get setup for doing that if I know what they are looking for. Eric -- Eric Ludlam: eric@siege-engine.com Siege: www.siege-engine.com Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net