From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harald Hanche-Olsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Build failure: feature not provided Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20080420.230347.166868239.hanche@math.ntnu.no> References: <7yhcdwmhxr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87od84xpgk.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208725453 19154 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2008 21:04:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: paul.r.ml@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 20 23:04:48 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JngiJ-0004rh-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:04:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jnghe-0002XR-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jngha-0002XL-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JnghY-0002WM-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JnghY-0002WJ-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnghY-0004Sm-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JnghX-0004vL-V6 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnghT-0004Q0-5f for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from abel.math.ntnu.no ([129.241.15.50]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JnghS-0004Oz-Gy for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 16470 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2008 21:03:48 -0000 Original-Received: from gauss.math.ntnu.no (HELO localhost) (hanche@129.241.15.102) by abel.math.ntnu.no with ESMTPA; 20 Apr 2008 21:03:48 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87od84xpgk.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/ X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2.51 on Emacs 23.0.0 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95548 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22089 Archived-At: + Paul R : > Glenn Morris writes: > > > Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > >> "maintainer-clean" should also fix it, but maybe it doesn't. > > > > It assuredly does (though there's nothing really to "fix"), if people > > would bother to search the list archives before reporting a problem as > > fundamental as a failure to build, over and over again. > > Sorry for this OT message, but I really find this tone unadapted when > speaking about someone making the effort to report a bug. That's okay. As a long time net user, I have developed thick skin and am not easily offended. However, I might point out that archives for this list were not available when I looked, back in February I think it was. I see they are now, so I could indeed have found the answer in the archives had I known they existed. Oh, wait a minute ... this is emacs-pretest-bug, but I see these messages appearing in the emacs-devel archives? Are the two addresses really the same list? - Harald