From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:00:10 +0200 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200803310000.m2V009BT014035@localhost.localdomain> References: <200803290100.m2T10Mgm007655@localhost.localdomain> <85iqz5rgvw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206923929 21323 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2008 00:38:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, dak@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tlikonen@iki.fi To: dhruva Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Mon Mar 31 02:39:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jg83S-0000AC-Dp for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:39:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jg82n-0008VU-Ba; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:38:37 +0100 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jg82k-0008V2-Rl for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:38:34 +0100 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4C059D86D3; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:37:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2V00HKK014051; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:00:17 +0200 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m2V009BT014035; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:00:10 +0200 In-reply-to: (message from dhruva on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:43:25 +0530) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.3 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.317, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.01, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00, TW_BZ 0.08) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:39601 gmane.emacs.devel:93995 Archived-At: I personally find it odd to compare between a GNU product and another GPL software. IMHO, we should be treating all GPLed softwares equally. Hence, comparison between git and bzr can be termed as apple to apple comparision. Who will support GNU projects if even between GNU teams, we do not support/promote them ? It's all about what RMS calls "fairness". We still can compare GNU bazaar with git, mercurial and al but we _should_ concentrate on promoting GNU bazaar as part of the GNU. I am a long time git user and will probably continue to use it but I also want GNU bazaar to improve. So I trying to join and to help in reaching this goal. Xavier