From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:22 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200803290100.m2T10Mgm007655@localhost.localdomain> References: Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206754760 11341 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2008 01:39:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, tlikonen@iki.fi, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sat Mar 29 02:39:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfQ2p-00072N-1J for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:39:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfQ2D-0005Gc-G0; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:39:05 +0000 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfQ1y-00057q-Ts for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:38:51 +0000 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 1D6E7D7CB8; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:36:41 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2T10cw6007690; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:40 +0100 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m2T10Mgm007655; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:22 +0100 In-reply-to: (message from dhruva on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:35:30 +0530) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.3 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.308, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.01, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00, TW_BZ 0.08) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:39484 gmane.emacs.devel:93736 Archived-At: I personally do not see a single mail which can tilt the scale in favor of bzr except it is part of GNU project. The "except it is part of GNU project" is the _main_ reason. Agreed or not, that's not the question. Maybe there is a need to explain on gnu.org, why a GNU project *should* support another GNU project when there are many free (or non-free) competitor projects. Xavier