From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:05 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200803290100.m2T1057v007622@localhost.localdomain> References: Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206754784 11396 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2008 01:39:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, rms@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tlikonen@iki.fi To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sat Mar 29 02:40:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfQ3G-00078t-TY for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:40:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfQ2f-0005Tl-DA; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:39:33 +0000 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfQ1y-00057h-RE for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:38:51 +0000 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id C1E19D7CAF; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:36:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2T10Cgd007638; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:13 +0100 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m2T1057v007622; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:00:05 +0100 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:55:12 -0400) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.3 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.3, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.02, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00, TW_BZ 0.08) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:39488 gmane.emacs.devel:93737 Archived-At: > [1] Bazaar tends to assume you want to work with the whole tree for > every operation. I think this might be the root cause of a lot of the > disappointment in Bazaar's performance. Actually, as far as I can tell, most of the above problems are unrelated to "single file vs whole tree": it takes about the same time to do it on a single file than on the whole tree. What's more, it takes really long time to perform things even with a pretty new bazaar repository. I have switched a few projects just to take measure and no matter how big is the history, all operations are rather expensive in time compared to any other DVC I am using. As my python skills are rather small, I can't contribute much to help "profiling" the code. Xavier