From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:43:21 +0200
Message-ID: <200803191143.21984.tlikonen@iki.fi>
References: <20080318154316.GA6242@mithlond.arda.local>
	<47DFE4EA.5000600@gmail.com> <vpqd4psqa29.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205919819 27724 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2008 09:43:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:43:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>,
	Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: bazaar@lists.canonical.com
Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Wed Mar 19 10:44:07 2008
Return-path: <bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com>
Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Jbuq5-0003x8-Ur
	for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:44:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com>)
	id 1JbupV-0002uF-Qg; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:43:30 +0000
Original-Received: from pne-smtpout4-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.154])
	by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <tlikonen@iki.fi>) id 1JbupP-0002u2-3z
	for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:43:23 +0000
Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] (80.220.180.181) by
	pne-smtpout4-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.3.129)
	id 478BE66300378886; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:43:22 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
In-Reply-To: <vpqd4psqa29.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Content-Disposition: inline
X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: bazaar discussion <bazaar.lists.canonical.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/bazaar>,
	<mailto:bazaar-request@lists.canonical.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar>
List-Post: <mailto:bazaar@lists.canonical.com>
List-Help: <mailto:bazaar-request@lists.canonical.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/bazaar>,
	<mailto:bazaar-request@lists.canonical.com?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com
Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38958 gmane.emacs.devel:92966
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/92966>

Matthieu Moy kirjoitti:

> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:
> > I no nothing about this, but it looks like the bzr developers
> > thinks that bzr is as fast as git:
> >
> >   http://bazaar-vcs.org/Benchmarks
> >
> > It looks like something is wrong, I have absolutely no idea what.
>
> AAUI, the benchmarks were done importing tarballs, not history, and
> therefore on a short-size history. I'd say "unrealisticly short-size
> history" indeed.

The page says:

"This page shows how Bazaar stacks up on 40-50 real Use Cases on 33 real 
projects."

<http://bazaar-vcs.org/Benchmarks>

If the benchmarks were done without any VCS history at all, then it 
really is not about "real Use Cases" on "real projects" as it claims.