From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: incomplete comment colorization in terminals Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:52:47 -0700 Message-ID: <200803132152.m2DLqlrn027171@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <20080311231514.B718249C0BB@daedalus.stanford.edu> <200803120445.m2C4jcDe015828@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200803130640.m2D6eoM5011012@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205445256 8199 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 21:54:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rob Riepel , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 22:54:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZvNr-0005qV-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:54:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvNI-0007IC-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvND-0007DB-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvNB-00077m-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZvNA-00077V-Tk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvNA-0006Z4-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvNA-0006ib-3q for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvN6-0006XQ-Ps for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZvN6-0006Vw-Ac; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:53:56 -0400 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1206049969.03465@emsN2F4xeNXbD1yNOTZ9Bg Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m2DLqlrn027171; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:21 -0400") Original-Lines: 14 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92435 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21559 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> It might be too close to the release, but maybe we could apply the > >> change for the light background case? > > > > If noone objects, it's fine by me. > > I don't mean to be difficult, but I wouldn't. Default font settings > are ridiculously controversial, and I think it's best to just leave > well alone at this stage. This change will reduce controversies, not generate them...