From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:00:10 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200803010100.m2110AGN008852@localhost.localdomain> References: Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204335247 9640 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2008 01:34:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 01:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 02:34:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVGcK-0001Ql-H4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVGbn-0004ej-UF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVGbj-0004eQ-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVGbh-0004eE-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVGbh-0004eB-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVGbh-0005sQ-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: by master.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id D50CAC9331; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:33:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1000@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2110E9j008863; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:00:14 +0100 Original-Received: (from xma@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m2110AGN008852; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 02:00:10 +0100 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:05:44 +0900) User-Agent: Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 on GNU/Linux Jabber-ID: xma01@jabber.fr X-uucpssh: Found to be clean X-uucpssh-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.4, required 4.6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-uucpssh-From: xma@gnu.org X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90940 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Let's wait until there's a problem before imposing a solution like > this. Indeed. I think Emacs has done pretty well with the basic rule "Don't be an idiot, and if you're not sure, ask the list first." People sometimes make mistakes, but by and large it seems to work out. I second that. As a simple lurker, what I see seems very clean and natural. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org