From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TODO Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:23:39 -0800 Message-ID: <200802262323.m1QNNd0P004463@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <5E2DA7EF-D0F1-4B0C-A3DC-F0B64FE2FE00@gmail.com> <13170DB6-B7A1-4843-AAF5-AB68B65D2331@gmail.com> <18370.18434.78349.822958@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200802261813.m1QIDEku015891@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200802261848.m1QImEag004425@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87zltn71uh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204068363 16403 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 23:26:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , mail.vjrao@gmail.com, Stefan Monnier , "rms@gnu.org" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 00:26:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU9Br-0006Zv-GJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:26:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU9BL-0007ks-Pa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU9BH-0007kQ-NA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU9BH-0007kD-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU9BG-0007k9-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:25:50 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JU9B8-0002tB-IQ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:25:42 -0500 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1204673023.25737@INPy0Mf/1UwwiOt65qJxJg Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m1QNNd0P004463; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zltn71uh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:08:22 +0900") Original-Lines: 13 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90544 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > The goal is not to revert the buffer after a checkin. Right now files > > are reverted by default after a checkin (because of the possibility that > > keyword expansion can change the file?). > > Surely only backends like CVS that actually do keyword expansion revert > the file, right....? No, the file is reverted anyway. AFAICT there's no way right now for a vc backend to specify that it does not want to revert the file after commit....