From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Emacs should survive a lost X connection Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:26:47 -0800 Message-ID: <200802102326.m1ANQnI3013958@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> References: <20080208.195113.190255739.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20080210.200457.117523959.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20080210.204412.99599742.hanche@math.ntnu.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202686078 10488 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 23:27:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Harald Hanche-Olsen , rms@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 00:28:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOLau-0000Qx-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:28:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOLaR-0000ei-8V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOLaL-0000cM-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOLaL-0000bJ-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOLaL-0000b0-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOLaK-0008BV-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JOLaK-0000Cf-MY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOLaH-0008B5-K7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:44 -0500 Original-Received: from sallyv1.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.109]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOLaD-0008AH-LV; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:27:38 -0500 X-ICS-MailScanner-Watermark: 1203290811.69258@Mdh8riaKf+NNjf7kaXO2mQ Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv1.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m1ANQnI3013958; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:26:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:09:25 +0000") Original-Lines: 32 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88684 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21001 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2008-02-10 19:44 +0000, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > > + Richard Stallman : > > > >> In any case, I think the following fix is called for. It reenables > >> the automatic clearing of x error catching, whose validity is assured > >> by the error check that I reenabled. Does this give you correct > >> behavior? > > > > I need to be in my office to test this, so it will have to wait until > > tomorrow. I'll get back with an answer then. > > > > As for the breakpoint you wanted me to try, I will try it, but as I > > have gotten different behaviours when running under gdb it's not clear > > that it will accomplish anything. > > > > - Harald > > With CVS 20080210 I am still seeing a bug that can be reproduced this > way: > > 1. emacs -q -nw -f server-start > 2. emacsclient -c ;; open a X frame > 3. C-x 5 0 to close the X frame > 4. Try `emacsclient -c' a second time > 5. Fatal error Is that with --enable-font-backend? If so, then it's a different problem. See the tread with the subject: "--enable-font-backend bug (was: Re: 23.0.60; emacs segfaults when creating X display via ...."