From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Mattie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there a mod-emacs? Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:11:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20080107171131.0ae7060e@reforged> References: <4870e7ae-ab72-4d0b-8d42-9a4ed0a54e8d@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <871w8vwb2e.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> <86prwfz310.fsf@timbral.net> <87sl1auqke.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0517744906==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199754915 19142 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2008 01:15:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:15:15 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 02:15:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC341-0007WF-Mm for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:15:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC33e-0000Pc-Fu for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC33N-0000Op-AG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:14:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC33I-0000NX-Qv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:14:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC33I-0000NN-Kf for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC33I-0002Dp-DC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so12899729wah.10 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:14:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=xwfoK7Ub7zlgtoxt5NnLmLgSmNzWWQ/imRANzOAP/vY=; b=O7XHwbX/fWIYuJ5LgIMUTnRbqTgiWnAAIb2LVk7QgGeSkrrQpRSjyCPd7Hpd2y1RWqLc/e8Fo85S4YEEC3mq05aeLGI9YKkGVmMAqJ+fGIfVYp15hSkl8EPDG3cMDArMuiTWGks7jRML0wPf4QQr4vNKfFdy/APS3Td7tVs8zw0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=sr4DrBeyggkea3ACwt9O1h+eFSz4dVtE7ixjc24NoOOvhyC6y5y6ojGu6H2yhZKMqciooth6ndzPOSpxZH9QbHszKtuImGs8AQlOnRNz+acEipkZ4RvaMrPojXGLOK944bt3BZkUauGNOf3RXya1w9s6CY4dZZLLJ+f6/Jz6up0= Original-Received: by 10.115.111.1 with SMTP id o1mr387996wam.87.1199754887052; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:14:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from reforged ( [71.217.198.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j34sm35954958waf.29.2008.01.07.17.14.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:14:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:50571 Archived-At: --===============0517744906== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/2NHbW3Dic2MwEe9CS2lJf0l"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 --Sig_/2NHbW3Dic2MwEe9CS2lJf0l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:55:49 +0100 Mathias Dahl wrote: > Tim X writes: >=20 > > Another approach that might be interesting is to create an emacs > > lisp package for common lisp. You could then take advantage of > > mod_lisp. Not sure how you would handle the lisp1 vs lisp2 > > differences >=20 > Both are Lisp2, aren't they? Maybe you thought about lexical vs > dynamical scoping? elisp is definitely lisp2 in that a symbol has both a function value and a variable value. elisp is dynamically scoped by default unless lexical-let is used. ______________________________________________ > help-gnu-emacs mailing list > help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs --Sig_/2NHbW3Dic2MwEe9CS2lJf0l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHgs3DdfRchrkBInkRAriuAKCSQbbp9OCenDPYpqcAmyVHwclliwCg2UKq EvHcFjKYtJOJUALR0+/pRtQ= =u6RR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2NHbW3Dic2MwEe9CS2lJf0l-- --===============0517744906== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ help-gnu-emacs mailing list help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs --===============0517744906==--